The Reception of Jonathan Swift throughout the Victorian Era: Diverse Perspectives of Swift among Critics

Abstract

Jonathan Swift, a prominent figure in the literary landscape of the eighteenth century, was widely recognized for his provocative and controversial satirical works. Scholars and literary experts have engaged in ongoing discussions and analysis over the controversial nature of his literary creations throughout the span of several centuries. While certain critics have said that his written works exhibit signs of misogyny, racism, and colonialism perspectives, alternative perspectives have seen him as a potent advocate for humanism and a catalyst for social change. This research focuses on the Victorian Era, spanning from 1837 until the death of Queen Victoria in 1901, and explores the various interpretations of Jonathan Swift's literary works within this historical period. This research draws upon the perspectives of several critics, such as Kelly, Orrery, Real, Thackeray, Macaulay, Graik, Bucknill, LoForte-Rand, and Taine, to assert that Swift was a figure of considerable controversy. The current study has also reached the finding that Swift demonstrated argumentative inclinations. The existence of multiple readings of Swift's Gulliver's Travels serves as support for this claim.